moey_dw wrote: Fri Jul 02, 2021 9:29 pm lol hankotrade............. who the hell are them

Hankotrade has an affiliate program.. thats what you're seeing. some people stuck in 2004 affiliate marketing

All marketing for commissions no traders LOL

hazelj80 wrote: Sat Jul 17, 2021 8:24 am Hankotrade has an affiliate program.. thats what you're seeing. some people stuck in 2004 affiliate marketing

All marketing for commissions no traders LOL

agree............ bunch of plebs man affiliate marketers lmao.............. reeks of desperation man

if its not the affiliate marketers its the indicator/system beggars that will get u

The FCA issued a warning about three new clone firms - ICM Capetal, Longleafmanagement and IntertradesFX. All three of these have claimed to be regulated by the FCA and to be running legitimate operations within the UK, but obviously that is not true.
Apparently clone companies lately are becoming more and more brazen and numerous.

I noticed OANDA also always have uncertain spike on tradingview, I saw many times, other broker price chart do not have that spike.

To stop having losses caused by dishonest brokers, which are the majority, there would only be one option: a system of identical parallel accounts.

The idea is the following:

Both the trader and the broker must have an identical account system. When the trader makes a deposit to the broker, a folder must be created in his bank account destined for that broker, while the broker creates an identical folder at the same time. This is not difficult to do with computer science programming.

So, when the trader deposits a certain amount of money, for example 1000 dollars, that money remains in HIS bank account, in a section or folder destined for that particular broker and is not under the domain of the broker. At the same time the broker receives that signal and creates an identical folder, where the amount that the trader wants to use to work with the broker appears.

That money is under the total control of the trader, who can withdraw it when he wishes, which is the right thing to do. That amount of $ 1000 is in the parallel account that the broker has but is not under his control.

The only money the broker should receive is when the trader has losses. Then these losses pass under the domain of the broker, the broker also receives the commissions and other losses suffered by the trader, such as swaps.

When the trader makes a profit, that money is added to his account for the broker, within his bank account. Each operation must be registered in both parallel accounts, both the trader's and the broker's.

Both the trader and the broker have identical profit and loss records, but the deposit of money remains under the control of the trader, as well as his profits. While the broker only receives his profits, which are the trader's losses, such as commissions and swaps from him.

I hope the idea is understood. But this would be the only way to be safe in online business in general.

jng640 wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:47 am I noticed OANDA also always have uncertain spike on tradingview, I saw many times, other broker price chart do not have that spike.

Have you spoken with their customer service to ask them about it?

mlawson71 wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 12:50 am Have you spoken with their customer service to ask them about it?

No, actually I don't use them, and many ppl also realize this issue.

jng640 wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:47 am I noticed OANDA also always have uncertain spike on tradingview, I saw many times, other broker price chart do not have that spike.

OANDA sucks big time. Nbats recently got a letter from them about their "130 pip slippage"

ChuChu Rocket wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 12:57 am OANDA sucks big time. Nbats recently got a letter from them about their "130 pip slippage"

130 pips is ridiculous!
Some of the "guru" still recommended them, maybe have get paid from them

jng640 wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 12:53 am No, actually I don't use them, and many ppl also realize this issue.

oanda........


"sorry about dat slippage"